Federalist papers (2+3)

From wikipedia

I’ve started listening to audio recordings of the Federalist Papers. I have to say that, at least so far, I’m not impressed by some of the arguments that they where making in favor of passing a Constitution that would unite the States under a Federal government. I realize that I can’t relate to some of them, just because the world we live in and the state of the country is just completely different.

For example, the argument that  a large Federal government is more efficient and has a larger pool of talent to draw on than many decentralized confederacies seems a bit silly now. However, during a time of inept local politicians (well maybe that hasn’t changed) and a much smaller population, this argument (from Federalist #3) must have made a lot more sense.

However, take this argument from Federalist #2 (written by John Jay):

They [the people] considered that the Congress [of 1774] was composed of many wise and experienced men. That, being convened from different parts of the country, they brought with them and communicated to each other a variety of useful information. That, in the course of the time they passed together in inquiring into and discussing the true interests of their country, they must have acquired very accurate knowledge on that head. That they were individually interested in the public liberty and prosperity, and therefore that it was not less their inclination than their duty to recommend only such measures as, after the most mature deliberation, they really thought prudent and advisable… every succeeding Congress, as well as the late convention, have invariably joined with the people in thinking that the prosperity of America depended on its Union.

Jay’s premise is that the majority of people were happy with the federalist goals of the original continental congress (a premise which he doesn’t provide support for) and then assumes that because the members of the congress were popular, they must have also been wise and knew what was best for the country. Then he rounds it off with a fallacious appeal to authority and historical precedence to support a large federal government.

It’s interesting to note that the Federalists were also against drafting the Bill of Rights.

7 Comments  »

  1. Marylin says:

    Hurrah! At last I got a web site from where
    I be able to actually take useful information concerning my study and knowledge.

  2. I just couldn’t leave yur web site before suggesting that I actually enjoyed the standard info a person provide for your visitors?

    Is going to be back often to check up on new posts

  3. Hi there, I want to subscribe for this webpage to get latest updates,
    thus where can i do it please assist.

  4. I do not even know how I finished up right here, however I thought this publish used to be great.
    I do not recognise who you’re but certainly you’re going to a well-known blogger for those who
    aren’t already. Cheers!

  5. I was recommended this website by means of my cousin. I am not positive
    whether or not this submit is written by way of him as nobody else recognize
    such certain about my problem. You are amazing!
    Thank you!

  6. I’m excited to find this site. I need to to thank you for your time
    due to this fantastic read!! I definitely enjoyed every bit of it and i also have you saved to fav to see new stuff on your blog.

  7. If some one wants expert view about blogging afterward i recommend him/her to
    visit this website, Keep up the nice job.

RSS feed for comments on this post, TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment