<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RH doesn&#8217;t understand ecology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH is wrong again? &#8211; false symmetry</title>
		<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>RH is wrong again? &#8211; false symmetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fs.pkheavy.com/?p=225#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] week I made a post criticizing Robin Hanson&#8217;s view of ecology, essentially saying that he was too optimistic about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I made a post criticizing Robin Hanson&#8217;s view of ecology, essentially saying that he was too optimistic about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Kurtz</title>
		<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Kurtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fs.pkheavy.com/?p=225#comment-84</guid>
		<description>But should they be? Especially when considering that many aspects of human lifestyle (and not just aesthetics or sense of quaint morality) rely on these species.

I will predict that your answer will be that human capitalism will engineer ways around the for these species (does anybody really need to eat a rare fish species, for example?).

To that, I say, we really don&#039;t know how ecological networks affect us. We&#039;ll be sorry if these networks are disrupted so that they (however temporarily) affect our own standards of living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But should they be? Especially when considering that many aspects of human lifestyle (and not just aesthetics or sense of quaint morality) rely on these species.</p>
<p>I will predict that your answer will be that human capitalism will engineer ways around the for these species (does anybody really need to eat a rare fish species, for example?).</p>
<p>To that, I say, we really don&#8217;t know how ecological networks affect us. We&#8217;ll be sorry if these networks are disrupted so that they (however temporarily) affect our own standards of living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olimay</title>
		<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>olimay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fs.pkheavy.com/?p=225#comment-82</guid>
		<description>In the comments &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/what-do-nature-lovers-love.html#comment-432757&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roko&lt;/a&gt; gives some links to some of Hanson&#039;s other writings that are related in that they talk about &lt;a href=&quot;http://hanson.gmu.edu/hardscra.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;human ecology&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comments <a href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/what-do-nature-lovers-love.html#comment-432757" rel="nofollow">Roko</a> gives some links to some of Hanson&#8217;s other writings that are related in that they talk about <a href="http://hanson.gmu.edu/hardscra.pdf" rel="nofollow">human ecology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/rh-doesnt-understand-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fs.pkheavy.com/?p=225#comment-81</guid>
		<description>The new human rates of change are not temporary.  Species that cannot keep up with these new rates are lost causes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new human rates of change are not temporary.  Species that cannot keep up with these new rates are lost causes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

