<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>false symmetry &#187; statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fs.pkheavy.com/tags/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Perspectives on Crime Statistics</title>
		<link>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/perspectives-on-crime-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/perspectives-on-crime-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Kurtz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fs.pkheavy.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are London's cameras really bad at preventing crime? And what are the alternatives?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/cameras-or-cops/">Freakonomics blogs about</a> how only 1 out of every thousand cameras in London lead to a crime being solved.</p>
<p>Dan Davis, MP says that this creates:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;a huge intrusion on privacy, yet … little or no improvement in security.</p></blockquote>
<p>But what&#8217;s the evidence of the latter. If Freakonomics is also correct in reporting that there are over a million cameras in London, then over 1000 crimes in London have been solved in London <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8219022.stm">this year</a> by cameras. The obvious question that nobody seems to be asking is whether the money could have been spent more efficiently elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fs.pkheavy.com/2009/09/perspectives-on-crime-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

